<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>Court Rules Against Solely Prosecuting Company Secretary in Amalgamation Case, Citing Abuse of Legal Process.</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/highlights?id=76820</link>
    <description>Approval of scheme of amalgamation - Application of the &quot;Alter Ego&quot; Principle - Violation of Section 233 of the Companies Act, 2013 - requirement of holding at least ninety percent of the total numbers of shares - The complainant (opposite party) argued that the petitioner made a false declaration regarding the approval of the amalgamation scheme, misleading the authorities by stating that the scheme was approved by the requisite majority of members, which did not constitute 90% of total members but rather those present and voting. - The High Court hold that by targeting the petitioner (the Company Secretary) alone, without implicating the corporation or other responsible individuals, the prosecution is deemed to be fundamentally flawed and.....</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Tue, 23 Apr 2024 11:48:33 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Tue, 23 Apr 2024 11:48:33 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=750832" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>Court Rules Against Solely Prosecuting Company Secretary in Amalgamation Case, Citing Abuse of Legal Process.</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/highlights?id=76820</link>
      <description>Approval of scheme of amalgamation - Application of the &quot;Alter Ego&quot; Principle - Violation of Section 233 of the Companies Act, 2013 - requirement of holding at least ninety percent of the total numbers of shares - The complainant (opposite party) argued that the petitioner made a false declaration regarding the approval of the amalgamation scheme, misleading the authorities by stating that the scheme was approved by the requisite majority of members, which did not constitute 90% of total members but rather those present and voting. - The High Court hold that by targeting the petitioner (the Company Secretary) alone, without implicating the corporation or other responsible individuals, the prosecution is deemed to be fundamentally flawed and.....</description>
      <category>Highlights</category>
      <law>Companies Law</law>
      <pubDate>Tue, 23 Apr 2024 11:48:33 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/highlights?id=76820</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>