<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>1978 (7) TMI 222 - KARNATAKA High Court</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=36537</link>
    <description>The Yelandur jahgir remained joint family property despite regulatory restrictions on alienation and partition under the 1885 Act, because those restrictions only governed enjoyment and distribution for the family&#039;s benefit. On abolition of the jahgir under the Inams Abolition Act, the property resumed its joint family character, and the compensation paid in lieu of the jahgir was received on behalf of the deceased and his branch members. For estate duty purposes under the Estate Duty Act, 1953, only the deceased&#039;s 4/9th share in the compensation was treated as property passing on death; the balance was not exclusively his estate.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Tue, 11 Jul 1978 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Tue, 23 Mar 2010 10:49:06 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=75083" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>1978 (7) TMI 222 - KARNATAKA High Court</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=36537</link>
      <description>The Yelandur jahgir remained joint family property despite regulatory restrictions on alienation and partition under the 1885 Act, because those restrictions only governed enjoyment and distribution for the family&#039;s benefit. On abolition of the jahgir under the Inams Abolition Act, the property resumed its joint family character, and the compensation paid in lieu of the jahgir was received on behalf of the deceased and his branch members. For estate duty purposes under the Estate Duty Act, 1953, only the deceased&#039;s 4/9th share in the compensation was treated as property passing on death; the balance was not exclusively his estate.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Tue, 11 Jul 1978 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=36537</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>