<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2024 (4) TMI 870 - KARNATAKA HIGH COURT</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=751689</link>
    <description>Pleadings before an arbitral tribunal under Section 23 include claim, defence, counterclaim and objections, and a rejoinder or surrejoinder filed with permission or court liberty forms part of that pleading cycle. On that basis, the tribunal was justified in treating 20.05.2023, when liberty to file surrejoinder was granted and the surrejoinder was filed, as the date of completion of pleadings for Section 29A(1). The period during which the arbitral proceedings remained stayed by judicial order was also required to be excluded while computing the statutory time limit for making the award. The challenge to the tribunal&#039;s computation of time was therefore unsuccessful.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Fri, 05 Apr 2024 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Tue, 23 Apr 2024 11:45:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=750799" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2024 (4) TMI 870 - KARNATAKA HIGH COURT</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=751689</link>
      <description>Pleadings before an arbitral tribunal under Section 23 include claim, defence, counterclaim and objections, and a rejoinder or surrejoinder filed with permission or court liberty forms part of that pleading cycle. On that basis, the tribunal was justified in treating 20.05.2023, when liberty to file surrejoinder was granted and the surrejoinder was filed, as the date of completion of pleadings for Section 29A(1). The period during which the arbitral proceedings remained stayed by judicial order was also required to be excluded while computing the statutory time limit for making the award. The challenge to the tribunal&#039;s computation of time was therefore unsuccessful.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Indian Laws</law>
      <pubDate>Fri, 05 Apr 2024 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=751689</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>