<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>1978 (3) TMI 12 - ALLAHABAD High Court</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=36532</link>
    <description>The High Court of Allahabad held that the share of profit of the assessee from M/s. Gajadhar Prasad Narain Das cannot be included in his total income for rate purposes if it has already been assessed in the hands of his father under s. 64(ii) of the I.T. Act, 1961. The decision favored the assessee, who was awarded costs of Rs. 200.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Wed, 22 Mar 1978 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Tue, 23 Mar 2010 10:37:46 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=75078" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>1978 (3) TMI 12 - ALLAHABAD High Court</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=36532</link>
      <description>The High Court of Allahabad held that the share of profit of the assessee from M/s. Gajadhar Prasad Narain Das cannot be included in his total income for rate purposes if it has already been assessed in the hands of his father under s. 64(ii) of the I.T. Act, 1961. The decision favored the assessee, who was awarded costs of Rs. 200.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Wed, 22 Mar 1978 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=36532</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>