<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2019 (1) TMI 2045 - CALCUTTA HIGH COURT</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=313578</link>
    <description>The RBI Master Circular was applied as a binding framework for identifying wilful default, and it was read to extend to promoters and directors where the company&#039;s default and diversion of funds were established. On the admitted facts of repayment default, diversion of funds, and the appellants&#039; roles as directors and promoters, the declaration of wilful defaulter status was upheld. The review committee was held to have acted within its remit by independently examining the matter, granting a personal hearing, and recording reasons. The objections on enlargement of the show-cause notice and breach of natural justice were rejected because the material facts were admitted and hearing was afforded.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Fri, 18 Jan 2019 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Mon, 22 Apr 2024 20:41:49 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=750769" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2019 (1) TMI 2045 - CALCUTTA HIGH COURT</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=313578</link>
      <description>The RBI Master Circular was applied as a binding framework for identifying wilful default, and it was read to extend to promoters and directors where the company&#039;s default and diversion of funds were established. On the admitted facts of repayment default, diversion of funds, and the appellants&#039; roles as directors and promoters, the declaration of wilful defaulter status was upheld. The review committee was held to have acted within its remit by independently examining the matter, granting a personal hearing, and recording reasons. The objections on enlargement of the show-cause notice and breach of natural justice were rejected because the material facts were admitted and hearing was afforded.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Indian Laws</law>
      <pubDate>Fri, 18 Jan 2019 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=313578</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>