<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>1991 (1) TMI 466 - MADRAS HIGH COURT</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=313568</link>
    <description>Section 482 of the Code of Criminal Procedure cannot be used by the High Court to interfere with executive orders on remission, suspension or parole under Section 432. The inherent criminal jurisdiction is confined to orders necessary to give effect to the Code, prevent abuse of process, or secure the ends of justice in relation to judicial proceedings, whereas remission and related powers are executive functions reserved to the Government and constitutional authorities. Limited judicial review of such executive action lies under Article 226, not under Section 482. The reference was answered against the petitioners.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Thu, 03 Jan 1991 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Mon, 22 Apr 2024 14:41:31 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=750734" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>1991 (1) TMI 466 - MADRAS HIGH COURT</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=313568</link>
      <description>Section 482 of the Code of Criminal Procedure cannot be used by the High Court to interfere with executive orders on remission, suspension or parole under Section 432. The inherent criminal jurisdiction is confined to orders necessary to give effect to the Code, prevent abuse of process, or secure the ends of justice in relation to judicial proceedings, whereas remission and related powers are executive functions reserved to the Government and constitutional authorities. Limited judicial review of such executive action lies under Article 226, not under Section 482. The reference was answered against the petitioners.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Indian Laws</law>
      <pubDate>Thu, 03 Jan 1991 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=313568</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>