<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>Tribunal Overturns Enhanced Tax Assessment, Upholds Assessee&#039;s Valuation Under Prescribed Methods.</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/highlights?id=76792</link>
    <description>Enhancement made by the Ld. CIT(A) u/s 251(1) r.w.s. 56(2) (viib) - AO substituted fair market value determined by the assessee through his own valuation - Assessees have submitted the Valuation Report duly signed by the auditor by following NAV/DCF Method as required under Rule 11UA(2) of the Rules - The Tribunal disagreed with this decision, highlighting that the assessee had provided a valuation report as per the prescribed method (Discounted Cash Flow Method under Rule 11UA(2)(b)). The Tribunal found that the lower authorities had inappropriately rejected this valuation report without providing a basis for doing so.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Mon, 22 Apr 2024 14:39:22 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Mon, 22 Apr 2024 14:39:22 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=750732" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>Tribunal Overturns Enhanced Tax Assessment, Upholds Assessee&#039;s Valuation Under Prescribed Methods.</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/highlights?id=76792</link>
      <description>Enhancement made by the Ld. CIT(A) u/s 251(1) r.w.s. 56(2) (viib) - AO substituted fair market value determined by the assessee through his own valuation - Assessees have submitted the Valuation Report duly signed by the auditor by following NAV/DCF Method as required under Rule 11UA(2) of the Rules - The Tribunal disagreed with this decision, highlighting that the assessee had provided a valuation report as per the prescribed method (Discounted Cash Flow Method under Rule 11UA(2)(b)). The Tribunal found that the lower authorities had inappropriately rejected this valuation report without providing a basis for doing so.</description>
      <category>Highlights</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Mon, 22 Apr 2024 14:39:22 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/highlights?id=76792</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>