<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2024 (4) TMI 848 - PATNA HIGH COURT</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=751667</link>
    <description>HC dismissed the writ petition challenging the 101st Constitutional Amendment Act, 2016. The court found no valid locus standi for the petitioner, who failed to demonstrate legal injury from the GST Council&#039;s constitutional provisions. While examining the basic structure argument, the court rejected the petition without imposing costs, emphasizing the need for genuine legal grievances in public interest litigation.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Mon, 01 Apr 2024 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Wed, 30 Apr 2025 13:08:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=750715" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2024 (4) TMI 848 - PATNA HIGH COURT</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=751667</link>
      <description>HC dismissed the writ petition challenging the 101st Constitutional Amendment Act, 2016. The court found no valid locus standi for the petitioner, who failed to demonstrate legal injury from the GST Council&#039;s constitutional provisions. While examining the basic structure argument, the court rejected the petition without imposing costs, emphasizing the need for genuine legal grievances in public interest litigation.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>GST</law>
      <pubDate>Mon, 01 Apr 2024 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=751667</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>