<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>Order Reserved by Bench Must Be Pronounced by Same Bench Unless New Developments Warrant Re-Hearing.</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/highlights?id=76782</link>
    <description>Bench Reconstitution and Order Pronouncement - Whether an order reserved by a bench could be pronounced by a reconstituted bench without considering a subsequent application that called for a re-hearing based on new developments. - According to Tribunal directives, a judgment reserved should ideally be pronounced by the same bench unless re-hearing is warranted by substantial subsequent developments. Ultimately, the Appellate Tribunal set aside the order pronounced by the reconstituted bench and remanded the case back to the regular bench for a fresh hearing. It emphasized that the judicial process must consider all relevant developments to ensure fair adjudication.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Mon, 22 Apr 2024 09:08:16 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Mon, 22 Apr 2024 09:08:16 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=750687" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>Order Reserved by Bench Must Be Pronounced by Same Bench Unless New Developments Warrant Re-Hearing.</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/highlights?id=76782</link>
      <description>Bench Reconstitution and Order Pronouncement - Whether an order reserved by a bench could be pronounced by a reconstituted bench without considering a subsequent application that called for a re-hearing based on new developments. - According to Tribunal directives, a judgment reserved should ideally be pronounced by the same bench unless re-hearing is warranted by substantial subsequent developments. Ultimately, the Appellate Tribunal set aside the order pronounced by the reconstituted bench and remanded the case back to the regular bench for a fresh hearing. It emphasized that the judicial process must consider all relevant developments to ensure fair adjudication.</description>
      <category>Highlights</category>
      <law>Insolvency and Bankruptcy</law>
      <pubDate>Mon, 22 Apr 2024 09:08:16 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/highlights?id=76782</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>