<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2024 (4) TMI 826 - NATIONAL COMPANY LAW APPELLATE TRIBUNAL , CHENNAI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=751645</link>
    <description>A financial creditor may maintain a section 7 insolvency application against a corporate guarantor even where CIRP has already been initiated against the principal borrower for the same debt and default. The guarantor&#039;s liability is co-extensive with that of the principal borrower, and default by the borrower triggers the guarantor&#039;s liability unless the guarantee contract provides otherwise. At the admission stage, the adjudicating authority examines only the existence of debt and default, not the merits of the recovery dispute or quantum objections. The simultaneous proceeding against the corporate guarantor was therefore maintainable, and admission of the application was upheld.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Thu, 18 Apr 2024 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Fri, 19 Apr 2024 14:50:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=750684" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2024 (4) TMI 826 - NATIONAL COMPANY LAW APPELLATE TRIBUNAL , CHENNAI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=751645</link>
      <description>A financial creditor may maintain a section 7 insolvency application against a corporate guarantor even where CIRP has already been initiated against the principal borrower for the same debt and default. The guarantor&#039;s liability is co-extensive with that of the principal borrower, and default by the borrower triggers the guarantor&#039;s liability unless the guarantee contract provides otherwise. At the admission stage, the adjudicating authority examines only the existence of debt and default, not the merits of the recovery dispute or quantum objections. The simultaneous proceeding against the corporate guarantor was therefore maintainable, and admission of the application was upheld.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Insolvency and Bankruptcy</law>
      <pubDate>Thu, 18 Apr 2024 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=751645</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>