<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>1980 (3) TMI 53 - ALLAHABAD High Court</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=36522</link>
    <description>A unilateral blending of self-acquired property into the common stock of a Hindu joint family was treated as neither a gift inter vivos nor a disposition attracting estate duty under sections 10 and 27 of the Estate Duty Act, 1953, so the blended amount was excluded from the estate. By contrast, goodwill was recognised as an asset of the firm and property within section 2(15); in the absence of a partnership term excluding heirs, the deceased partner&#039;s share in goodwill devolved on death and its value was includible in the principal value of the estate. The matter thus resulted in exclusion of the blending amount but inclusion of the goodwill value.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Fri, 28 Mar 1980 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Tue, 23 Mar 2010 10:17:18 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=75068" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>1980 (3) TMI 53 - ALLAHABAD High Court</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=36522</link>
      <description>A unilateral blending of self-acquired property into the common stock of a Hindu joint family was treated as neither a gift inter vivos nor a disposition attracting estate duty under sections 10 and 27 of the Estate Duty Act, 1953, so the blended amount was excluded from the estate. By contrast, goodwill was recognised as an asset of the firm and property within section 2(15); in the absence of a partnership term excluding heirs, the deceased partner&#039;s share in goodwill devolved on death and its value was includible in the principal value of the estate. The matter thus resulted in exclusion of the blending amount but inclusion of the goodwill value.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Fri, 28 Mar 1980 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=36522</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>