<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2024 (4) TMI 812 - ANDHRA PRADESH HIGH COURT</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=751631</link>
    <description>GST transition did not, by itself, extinguish a registered dealer&#039;s entitlement to concessional CST through Form C for inter-State purchase of natural gas, where the statutory conditions under the CST framework continued to be satisfied. The post-GST amendment to the definition of goods did not curtail the operation of Section 8 or the machinery for issuing Form C, and the established legal position supported continued acceptance of the forms. Form C could also be furnished after assessment on showing sufficient cause, and the assessing authority could act on it. Where the purchaser bore the tax incidence, refund had to be processed in accordance with law and unjust enrichment could not defeat the claim.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Wed, 13 Mar 2024 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Mon, 22 Apr 2024 09:07:26 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=750662" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2024 (4) TMI 812 - ANDHRA PRADESH HIGH COURT</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=751631</link>
      <description>GST transition did not, by itself, extinguish a registered dealer&#039;s entitlement to concessional CST through Form C for inter-State purchase of natural gas, where the statutory conditions under the CST framework continued to be satisfied. The post-GST amendment to the definition of goods did not curtail the operation of Section 8 or the machinery for issuing Form C, and the established legal position supported continued acceptance of the forms. Form C could also be furnished after assessment on showing sufficient cause, and the assessing authority could act on it. Where the purchaser bore the tax incidence, refund had to be processed in accordance with law and unjust enrichment could not defeat the claim.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>VAT and Sales Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Wed, 13 Mar 2024 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=751631</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>