https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=313567 Whether the contract as amended made the respondents liable to bear and reimburse GST and, consequently, whether withholding the GST component from running bills was permissible. The HC construed the amended work order and related contractual terms to place GST liability on the respondents, and held that withholding the GST impact was arbitrary, violative of the agreement, and contrary to the respondents' own stipulations. The SC found no ground to interfere with that determination and upheld the HC's direction, resulting in rejection of the challenge and disposal of the petition. en-us Fri, 10 Nov 2023 00:00:00 +0530 Mon, 12 Jan 2026 15:04:00 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=313567 Whether the contract as amended made the respondents liable to bear and reimburse GST and, consequently, whether withholding the GST component from running bills was permissible. The HC construed the amended work order and related contractual terms to place GST liability on the respondents, and held that withholding the GST impact was arbitrary, violative of the agreement, and contrary to the respondents' own stipulations. The SC found no ground to interfere with that determination and upheld the HC's direction, resulting in rejection of the challenge and disposal of the petition. Case-Laws GST Fri, 10 Nov 2023 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=313567