<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2021 (8) TMI 1416 - MADRAS HIGH COURT</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=313565</link>
    <description>A suit for declaration, possession and injunction cannot be prosecuted through a power of attorney holder where the power of attorney was executed outside India and had not been adjudicated before the competent authority; the text treats that objection as substantive and fatal to maintainability. It also states that relief over immovable property depends on clear identification of the suit property, because an executable decree cannot rest on uncertain pleadings, incomplete measurements or an unidentifiable survey reference. On that basis, the note records that the suit failed for want of authorised representation and uncertain property identity.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Wed, 04 Aug 2021 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Sat, 20 Apr 2024 22:47:42 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=750659" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2021 (8) TMI 1416 - MADRAS HIGH COURT</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=313565</link>
      <description>A suit for declaration, possession and injunction cannot be prosecuted through a power of attorney holder where the power of attorney was executed outside India and had not been adjudicated before the competent authority; the text treats that objection as substantive and fatal to maintainability. It also states that relief over immovable property depends on clear identification of the suit property, because an executable decree cannot rest on uncertain pleadings, incomplete measurements or an unidentifiable survey reference. On that basis, the note records that the suit failed for want of authorised representation and uncertain property identity.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Indian Laws</law>
      <pubDate>Wed, 04 Aug 2021 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=313565</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>