<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2018 (3) TMI 2035 - ALLAHABAD HIGH COURT</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=313564</link>
    <description>Seized goods under the U.P. GST regime were directed to be released forthwith, subject to furnishing security other than cash or bank guarantee, or alternatively an indemnity bond equal to the value of tax and penalty to the satisfaction of the seizing authority. The court also kept the matter pending for further hearing. The operative effect is that interim release was allowed against security, rather than continued detention of the goods.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Mon, 12 Mar 2018 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Tue, 25 Feb 2025 15:38:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=750658" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2018 (3) TMI 2035 - ALLAHABAD HIGH COURT</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=313564</link>
      <description>Seized goods under the U.P. GST regime were directed to be released forthwith, subject to furnishing security other than cash or bank guarantee, or alternatively an indemnity bond equal to the value of tax and penalty to the satisfaction of the seizing authority. The court also kept the matter pending for further hearing. The operative effect is that interim release was allowed against security, rather than continued detention of the goods.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>GST</law>
      <pubDate>Mon, 12 Mar 2018 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=313564</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>