https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=313555 A written authority appointing a pleader is sufficient if it is signed by the person concerned, even if it is not in the ordinary form of a vakalatnama and its description of the appeal is incomplete. A post card stitched to a sheet bearing court-fee labels was treated as valid authority under Order 3, Rule 4 CPC because it was a signed written authorisation. The court-fee requirement was also satisfied, since the proper fee had in fact been paid by affixing labels of the required amount to the sheet; physical stamping of the document itself was not necessary for validity. The appeal was therefore properly presented. en-us Fri, 08 Sep 1950 00:00:00 +0530 Sat, 20 Apr 2024 12:06:59 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=313555 A written authority appointing a pleader is sufficient if it is signed by the person concerned, even if it is not in the ordinary form of a vakalatnama and its description of the appeal is incomplete. A post card stitched to a sheet bearing court-fee labels was treated as valid authority under Order 3, Rule 4 CPC because it was a signed written authorisation. The court-fee requirement was also satisfied, since the proper fee had in fact been paid by affixing labels of the required amount to the sheet; physical stamping of the document itself was not necessary for validity. The appeal was therefore properly presented. Case-Laws Indian Laws Fri, 08 Sep 1950 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=313555