https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=313547 A power of attorney executed before and authenticated by a notary public is presumed duly executed, and a holder of a general power of attorney may act as a recognised agent for the plaintiffs. A plaint signed by such an authorised agent and verified by a person acquainted with the facts satisfies the procedural requirements for corporate pleadings. On the merits, copyright infringement was established by direct and corroborative evidence of relay on the defendants' premises on the relevant date, and the absence of proof of innocent infringement did not excuse liability. The plaintiffs were therefore entitled to injunctive relief, damages, and costs. en-us Mon, 07 Nov 1938 00:00:00 +0530 Sat, 20 Apr 2024 10:54:40 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=313547 A power of attorney executed before and authenticated by a notary public is presumed duly executed, and a holder of a general power of attorney may act as a recognised agent for the plaintiffs. A plaint signed by such an authorised agent and verified by a person acquainted with the facts satisfies the procedural requirements for corporate pleadings. On the merits, copyright infringement was established by direct and corroborative evidence of relay on the defendants' premises on the relevant date, and the absence of proof of innocent infringement did not excuse liability. The plaintiffs were therefore entitled to injunctive relief, damages, and costs. Case-Laws Indian Laws Mon, 07 Nov 1938 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=313547