https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=313541 Allegations based on a website describing a consultancy unit as a sister concern, together with payments to consultants from the company account, did not disclose the essential ingredients of forgery, cheating, criminal breach-related offences, or offences under the Information Technology Act. The website content itself indicated that the consultancy unit formed part of the same corporate entity, and no separate receipt of money in the appellant's name or in the unit's name was shown. In the absence of deception, wrongful gain, false document, or dishonest intent, continuation of the prosecution was treated as an abuse of process and the criminal proceedings were quashed. en-us Tue, 19 Apr 2016 00:00:00 +0530 Sat, 20 Apr 2024 08:46:03 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=313541 Allegations based on a website describing a consultancy unit as a sister concern, together with payments to consultants from the company account, did not disclose the essential ingredients of forgery, cheating, criminal breach-related offences, or offences under the Information Technology Act. The website content itself indicated that the consultancy unit formed part of the same corporate entity, and no separate receipt of money in the appellant's name or in the unit's name was shown. In the absence of deception, wrongful gain, false document, or dishonest intent, continuation of the prosecution was treated as an abuse of process and the criminal proceedings were quashed. Case-Laws Indian Laws Tue, 19 Apr 2016 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=313541