<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2024 (4) TMI 794 - BOMBAY HIGH COURT</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=751613</link>
    <description>The Bombay HC addressed the adjudication of a show cause notice issued 17 years prior, questioning the jurisdiction and legality of categorizing the petitioner as an importer. The court found the prolonged delay without adjudication or stay to be arbitrary and potentially illegal. Consequently, the court admitted the petition and ordered a stay on the impugned notice, pending further proceedings, due to doubts about jurisdiction and the significant delay.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Wed, 17 Apr 2024 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Thu, 25 Apr 2024 15:02:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=750593" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2024 (4) TMI 794 - BOMBAY HIGH COURT</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=751613</link>
      <description>The Bombay HC addressed the adjudication of a show cause notice issued 17 years prior, questioning the jurisdiction and legality of categorizing the petitioner as an importer. The court found the prolonged delay without adjudication or stay to be arbitrary and potentially illegal. Consequently, the court admitted the petition and ordered a stay on the impugned notice, pending further proceedings, due to doubts about jurisdiction and the significant delay.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Customs</law>
      <pubDate>Wed, 17 Apr 2024 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=751613</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>