<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2024 (4) TMI 788 - CESTAT NEW DELHI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=751607</link>
    <description>CESTAT New Delhi held that service tax demands totaling Rs. 11,62,98,132/- were set aside as the extended period of limitation was improperly invoked. The tribunal ruled that Rs. 5,25,39,217/- already paid with interest prior to show cause notice was covered under section 73(3) and excluded from demand. Another Rs. 6,37,58,915/- for unpaid service tax reflected in ST-3 returns for 2012-14 was also set aside as elements for extended limitation weren&#039;t established. Penalty under section 78 was dropped. Revenue&#039;s appeal regarding Rs. 2,18,35,039/- dropped under rule 6(3) CCR was dismissed for lack of merit. Assessee&#039;s appeal allowed; Revenue&#039;s appeal dismissed.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Thu, 18 Apr 2024 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Thu, 26 Feb 2026 18:37:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=750581" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2024 (4) TMI 788 - CESTAT NEW DELHI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=751607</link>
      <description>CESTAT New Delhi held that service tax demands totaling Rs. 11,62,98,132/- were set aside as the extended period of limitation was improperly invoked. The tribunal ruled that Rs. 5,25,39,217/- already paid with interest prior to show cause notice was covered under section 73(3) and excluded from demand. Another Rs. 6,37,58,915/- for unpaid service tax reflected in ST-3 returns for 2012-14 was also set aside as elements for extended limitation weren&#039;t established. Penalty under section 78 was dropped. Revenue&#039;s appeal regarding Rs. 2,18,35,039/- dropped under rule 6(3) CCR was dismissed for lack of merit. Assessee&#039;s appeal allowed; Revenue&#039;s appeal dismissed.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Service Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Thu, 18 Apr 2024 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=751607</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>