<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2024 (4) TMI 782 - HIMACHAL PRADESH HIGH COURT</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=751601</link>
    <description>Delay in filing the criminal revision was condoned because the reasons were found bona fide and unintentional, and the complainant did not oppose condonation. On the merits, the parties stated that the entire cheque liability had been discharged and the complainant had received the full amount with no subsisting claim. As the offence under the Negotiable Instruments Act was compoundable, the Court permitted settlement and treated further proceedings as unnecessary, noting that continuation after full satisfaction would serve no useful purpose and amount to abuse of process. The conviction and sentence were therefore quashed on the basis of settlement and compounding.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Mon, 08 Apr 2024 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Fri, 19 Apr 2024 10:48:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=750572" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2024 (4) TMI 782 - HIMACHAL PRADESH HIGH COURT</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=751601</link>
      <description>Delay in filing the criminal revision was condoned because the reasons were found bona fide and unintentional, and the complainant did not oppose condonation. On the merits, the parties stated that the entire cheque liability had been discharged and the complainant had received the full amount with no subsisting claim. As the offence under the Negotiable Instruments Act was compoundable, the Court permitted settlement and treated further proceedings as unnecessary, noting that continuation after full satisfaction would serve no useful purpose and amount to abuse of process. The conviction and sentence were therefore quashed on the basis of settlement and compounding.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Indian Laws</law>
      <pubDate>Mon, 08 Apr 2024 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=751601</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>