<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2023 (1) TMI 1368 - CALCUTTA HIGH COURT</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=313536</link>
    <description>The HC condoned the delay in filing the appeal under Section 260A of the Income Tax Act, 1961, but ultimately dismissed the appeal. The HC concurred with the CIT(A) and ITAT that the assessment was barred by limitation under Section 153(3)(ii) of the Act, finding no substantial question of law for consideration.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Tue, 03 Jan 2023 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Wed, 28 Aug 2024 13:08:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=750567" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2023 (1) TMI 1368 - CALCUTTA HIGH COURT</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=313536</link>
      <description>The HC condoned the delay in filing the appeal under Section 260A of the Income Tax Act, 1961, but ultimately dismissed the appeal. The HC concurred with the CIT(A) and ITAT that the assessment was barred by limitation under Section 153(3)(ii) of the Act, finding no substantial question of law for consideration.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Tue, 03 Jan 2023 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=313536</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>