<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2021 (11) TMI 1190 - BOMBAY HIGH COURT</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=313534</link>
    <description>The Bombay HC upheld the ITAT&#039;s decision to delete the addition of Rs.22,45,06,500, finding insufficient grounds to sustain the addition based on seized documents. Regarding the Section 13(1)(c) violation, the court affirmed that only the income violating the provision forfeits exemption, aligning with Circular No.387, not the entire income.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Wed, 24 Nov 2021 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Thu, 06 Feb 2025 14:55:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=750565" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2021 (11) TMI 1190 - BOMBAY HIGH COURT</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=313534</link>
      <description>The Bombay HC upheld the ITAT&#039;s decision to delete the addition of Rs.22,45,06,500, finding insufficient grounds to sustain the addition based on seized documents. Regarding the Section 13(1)(c) violation, the court affirmed that only the income violating the provision forfeits exemption, aligning with Circular No.387, not the entire income.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Wed, 24 Nov 2021 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=313534</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>