https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=313527 The HC dismissed the Bank's appeal, ruling that the deduction from the petitioner's retiral dues was unjustified. The court ordered the Bank to refund the deducted amount with costs of Rs. 3,000/-. It highlighted the Bank's failure to adhere to legal principles, procedural fairness, and the limitation period in recovery actions. en-us Tue, 12 Oct 2004 00:00:00 +0530 Fri, 19 Apr 2024 17:55:31 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=313527 The HC dismissed the Bank's appeal, ruling that the deduction from the petitioner's retiral dues was unjustified. The court ordered the Bank to refund the deducted amount with costs of Rs. 3,000/-. It highlighted the Bank's failure to adhere to legal principles, procedural fairness, and the limitation period in recovery actions. Case-Laws Indian Laws Tue, 12 Oct 2004 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=313527