<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>Petitioner&#039;s GSTIN Activated Retroactively Due to Technical Errors, Allowing Input Tax Credit Claim from July 1, 2017.</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/highlights?id=76747</link>
    <description>Seeking activation of GSTIN and granting final certificate of registration to the Petitioners from 01.07.2017 - The case involved a dispute regarding the activation of the petitioner&#039;s GSTIN under the Goods and Services Tax (GST) regime. Technical glitches initially resulted in the linkage of the petitioner&#039;s GSTIN to the PAN of a partnership firm instead of the proprietor&#039;s PAN. As a consequence, the petitioner faced challenges in availing input tax credit for purchases made during the transition period. - The High Court found merit in the petitioner&#039;s argument, ruling that they were not responsible for the initial technical errors. The Court ordered the activation of the correct GSTIN with retroactive effect from July 1, 2017, allowing the petitioner to avail input tax credit for the relevant period.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Fri, 19 Apr 2024 17:47:26 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Fri, 19 Apr 2024 17:47:26 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=750552" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>Petitioner&#039;s GSTIN Activated Retroactively Due to Technical Errors, Allowing Input Tax Credit Claim from July 1, 2017.</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/highlights?id=76747</link>
      <description>Seeking activation of GSTIN and granting final certificate of registration to the Petitioners from 01.07.2017 - The case involved a dispute regarding the activation of the petitioner&#039;s GSTIN under the Goods and Services Tax (GST) regime. Technical glitches initially resulted in the linkage of the petitioner&#039;s GSTIN to the PAN of a partnership firm instead of the proprietor&#039;s PAN. As a consequence, the petitioner faced challenges in availing input tax credit for purchases made during the transition period. - The High Court found merit in the petitioner&#039;s argument, ruling that they were not responsible for the initial technical errors. The Court ordered the activation of the correct GSTIN with retroactive effect from July 1, 2017, allowing the petitioner to avail input tax credit for the relevant period.</description>
      <category>Highlights</category>
      <law>GST</law>
      <pubDate>Fri, 19 Apr 2024 17:47:26 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/highlights?id=76747</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>