https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=313526 The HC ruled in favor of the petitioner, determining that the petitioner was a buyer, not a manufacturer, under the Central Excises and Salt Act. The court set aside the trade notice and related communications from the Superintendent of Central Excise, concluding that the petitioner did not require an excise license. No costs were imposed. en-us Tue, 05 Feb 1980 00:00:00 +0530 Fri, 19 Apr 2024 17:12:37 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=313526 The HC ruled in favor of the petitioner, determining that the petitioner was a buyer, not a manufacturer, under the Central Excises and Salt Act. The court set aside the trade notice and related communications from the Superintendent of Central Excise, concluding that the petitioner did not require an excise license. No costs were imposed. Case-Laws Central Excise Tue, 05 Feb 1980 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=313526