<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>1999 (3) TMI 677 - Supreme Court</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=313525</link>
    <description>SC ruled that the Board legally introduced a pension scheme prospectively from 1.7.1986. Employees who retired before this date cannot compel retrospective application. The Court emphasized that new pension schemes benefit only future retirees unless expressly made retrospective. The decision was based on established legal precedents regarding the prospective nature of pension scheme introductions, considering financial constraints and existing retirement benefits.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Fri, 26 Mar 1999 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Wed, 28 May 2025 10:10:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=750545" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>1999 (3) TMI 677 - Supreme Court</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=313525</link>
      <description>SC ruled that the Board legally introduced a pension scheme prospectively from 1.7.1986. Employees who retired before this date cannot compel retrospective application. The Court emphasized that new pension schemes benefit only future retirees unless expressly made retrospective. The decision was based on established legal precedents regarding the prospective nature of pension scheme introductions, considering financial constraints and existing retirement benefits.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Indian Laws</law>
      <pubDate>Fri, 26 Mar 1999 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=313525</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>