<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2013 (8) TMI 1183 - DELHI HIGH COURT</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=313520</link>
    <description>Allegations were found not to fall prima facie within the Delhi Cooperative Societies Act, 2003 so as to exclude prosecution under the penal law, and the claimed statutory bar was rejected. The Court also held that prosecution could not proceed simultaneously for offences under Sections 409 and 420 of the IPC in the manner urged. As a result, the petitioner was discharged from the charge under Section 409, while prosecution under Sections 420 and 477A continued.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Fri, 23 Aug 2013 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Fri, 19 Apr 2024 11:52:24 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=750521" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2013 (8) TMI 1183 - DELHI HIGH COURT</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=313520</link>
      <description>Allegations were found not to fall prima facie within the Delhi Cooperative Societies Act, 2003 so as to exclude prosecution under the penal law, and the claimed statutory bar was rejected. The Court also held that prosecution could not proceed simultaneously for offences under Sections 409 and 420 of the IPC in the manner urged. As a result, the petitioner was discharged from the charge under Section 409, while prosecution under Sections 420 and 477A continued.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Indian Laws</law>
      <pubDate>Fri, 23 Aug 2013 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=313520</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>