<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>1980 (1) TMI 37 - RAJASTHAN High Court</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=36506</link>
    <description>The High Court upheld the Tribunal&#039;s decision to register the partnership firm for the assessment year 1964-65, emphasizing the genuineness of the firm and accepting clerical errors as valid reasons for filing delays. The Court ruled in favor of the assessee, rejecting the revenue&#039;s challenge regarding the Tribunal&#039;s jurisdiction to allow new points to be raised. Each party was directed to bear their own costs in the case.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Fri, 18 Jan 1980 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Mon, 22 Mar 2010 17:12:29 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=75052" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>1980 (1) TMI 37 - RAJASTHAN High Court</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=36506</link>
      <description>The High Court upheld the Tribunal&#039;s decision to register the partnership firm for the assessment year 1964-65, emphasizing the genuineness of the firm and accepting clerical errors as valid reasons for filing delays. The Court ruled in favor of the assessee, rejecting the revenue&#039;s challenge regarding the Tribunal&#039;s jurisdiction to allow new points to be raised. Each party was directed to bear their own costs in the case.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Fri, 18 Jan 1980 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=36506</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>