<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2024 (4) TMI 777 - MADRAS HIGH COURT</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=751596</link>
    <description>HC ruled partially in favor of petitioner challenging tax assessment order. The court set aside the original order and remitted the case back to tax authorities, directing petitioner to submit required documents, respond to notices, and pay 10% of disputed tax within 60 days. Failure to comply would allow tax department to proceed with recovery. No costs were awarded.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Mon, 15 Apr 2024 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Wed, 30 Apr 2025 10:52:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=750508" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2024 (4) TMI 777 - MADRAS HIGH COURT</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=751596</link>
      <description>HC ruled partially in favor of petitioner challenging tax assessment order. The court set aside the original order and remitted the case back to tax authorities, directing petitioner to submit required documents, respond to notices, and pay 10% of disputed tax within 60 days. Failure to comply would allow tax department to proceed with recovery. No costs were awarded.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>GST</law>
      <pubDate>Mon, 15 Apr 2024 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=751596</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>