<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2024 (4) TMI 774 - MADRAS HIGH COURT</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=751593</link>
    <description>In a tax dispute involving goods transport agency services, the SC found the tax authority&#039;s order unjust. The court set aside the order due to lack of personal hearing and incomplete document review. The matter was remanded for reconsideration, allowing the petitioner to submit additional documents within two weeks and directing the respondent to issue a fresh order within two months.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Mon, 15 Apr 2024 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Wed, 30 Apr 2025 10:55:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=750505" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2024 (4) TMI 774 - MADRAS HIGH COURT</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=751593</link>
      <description>In a tax dispute involving goods transport agency services, the SC found the tax authority&#039;s order unjust. The court set aside the order due to lack of personal hearing and incomplete document review. The matter was remanded for reconsideration, allowing the petitioner to submit additional documents within two weeks and directing the respondent to issue a fresh order within two months.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>GST</law>
      <pubDate>Mon, 15 Apr 2024 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=751593</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>