<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2024 (4) TMI 768 - MADRAS HIGH COURT</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=751587</link>
    <description>The HC examined a service tax demand case involving penalties and interest under the Finance Act, 1994. After considering arguments, the court granted the petitioner liberty to challenge the order before the Appellate Commissioner within 30 days, directing merit-based review without limitation constraints. The writ petition was disposed of, with the vehicle&#039;s release subject to confiscation proceedings&#039; final outcome.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Wed, 10 Apr 2024 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Wed, 30 Apr 2025 11:30:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=750499" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2024 (4) TMI 768 - MADRAS HIGH COURT</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=751587</link>
      <description>The HC examined a service tax demand case involving penalties and interest under the Finance Act, 1994. After considering arguments, the court granted the petitioner liberty to challenge the order before the Appellate Commissioner within 30 days, directing merit-based review without limitation constraints. The writ petition was disposed of, with the vehicle&#039;s release subject to confiscation proceedings&#039; final outcome.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>GST</law>
      <pubDate>Wed, 10 Apr 2024 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=751587</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>