<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2024 (4) TMI 766 - MADRAS HIGH COURT</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=751585</link>
    <description>The HC allowed the petitioner&#039;s challenge to tax assessment orders for 2019-2020. The court set aside the impugned orders, remanded the matter for reconsideration, and directed the tax authority to provide a reasonable opportunity for hearing. The consequential attachment order was also set aside, with the petitioner required to respond to the show cause notice within two weeks and the authority to issue a fresh order within two months.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Mon, 08 Apr 2024 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Wed, 30 Apr 2025 12:09:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=750497" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2024 (4) TMI 766 - MADRAS HIGH COURT</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=751585</link>
      <description>The HC allowed the petitioner&#039;s challenge to tax assessment orders for 2019-2020. The court set aside the impugned orders, remanded the matter for reconsideration, and directed the tax authority to provide a reasonable opportunity for hearing. The consequential attachment order was also set aside, with the petitioner required to respond to the show cause notice within two weeks and the authority to issue a fresh order within two months.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>GST</law>
      <pubDate>Mon, 08 Apr 2024 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=751585</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>