<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2024 (4) TMI 754 - MADRAS HIGH COURT</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=751573</link>
    <description>HC found procedural irregularities in tax registration cancellation. Despite alternative appeal remedy, court recognized principles of natural justice were violated. The petitioner was not adequately notified, and no hearing was conducted before cancellation. HC directed the petitioner to file an appeal within 30 days, with Appellate Authority mandated to decide the matter expeditiously, waiving limitation period concerns.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Tue, 03 Oct 2023 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Wed, 30 Apr 2025 15:28:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=750485" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2024 (4) TMI 754 - MADRAS HIGH COURT</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=751573</link>
      <description>HC found procedural irregularities in tax registration cancellation. Despite alternative appeal remedy, court recognized principles of natural justice were violated. The petitioner was not adequately notified, and no hearing was conducted before cancellation. HC directed the petitioner to file an appeal within 30 days, with Appellate Authority mandated to decide the matter expeditiously, waiving limitation period concerns.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>GST</law>
      <pubDate>Tue, 03 Oct 2023 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=751573</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>