<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2024 (4) TMI 730 - CESTAT KOLKATA</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=751549</link>
    <description>CESTAT Kolkata held that the one-year limitation period for filing Special Additional Duty (SAD) refund claims commences from the date of payment of additional customs duty, not from the date of sale of goods. The Tribunal applied the precedent from Abhishek Marketing case and distinguished Delhi HC judgments as pertaining to pre-2008 amendment provisions under Notification No. 93/2008-Cus. The appeals were dismissed and impugned orders were upheld.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Wed, 17 Apr 2024 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Thu, 18 Apr 2024 18:12:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=750457" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2024 (4) TMI 730 - CESTAT KOLKATA</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=751549</link>
      <description>CESTAT Kolkata held that the one-year limitation period for filing Special Additional Duty (SAD) refund claims commences from the date of payment of additional customs duty, not from the date of sale of goods. The Tribunal applied the precedent from Abhishek Marketing case and distinguished Delhi HC judgments as pertaining to pre-2008 amendment provisions under Notification No. 93/2008-Cus. The appeals were dismissed and impugned orders were upheld.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Customs</law>
      <pubDate>Wed, 17 Apr 2024 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=751549</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>