<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2023 (8) TMI 1450 - ALLAHABAD HIGH COURT</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=313516</link>
    <description>The HC examined a tax deposit case under GST Act 2017. After the petitioner deposited tax under Section 129(1) and made a representation for adjudication under Section 129(3), the state counsel committed to taking necessary action. The HC disposed of the writ petition, preserving the petitioner&#039;s right to pursue further legal remedies.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Fri, 04 Aug 2023 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Fri, 18 Apr 2025 15:07:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=750439" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2023 (8) TMI 1450 - ALLAHABAD HIGH COURT</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=313516</link>
      <description>The HC examined a tax deposit case under GST Act 2017. After the petitioner deposited tax under Section 129(1) and made a representation for adjudication under Section 129(3), the state counsel committed to taking necessary action. The HC disposed of the writ petition, preserving the petitioner&#039;s right to pursue further legal remedies.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>GST</law>
      <pubDate>Fri, 04 Aug 2023 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=313516</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>