<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>Reassessment Notice Invalidated: Court Rules Speculative Assumptions Insufficient for &quot;Tangible Material&quot; Requirement.</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/highlights?id=76707</link>
    <description>Validity of Reopening of assessment - “tangible material” as may ever give rise to a “reason to believe&quot; - Reliance on the Report of the Justice M.B. Shah Commission - The High Codurt observed that the assessing authority primarily based its action on the report, which did not provide a definitive finding but only a possibility of under-invoicing. The court held that this did not constitute &quot;tangible material&quot; required to form a &quot;reason to believe&quot;. Consequently, the reassessment notice was deemed invalid as it was founded on speculative assumptions rather than hard evidence.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Thu, 18 Apr 2024 18:13:11 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Thu, 18 Apr 2024 18:13:11 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=750429" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>Reassessment Notice Invalidated: Court Rules Speculative Assumptions Insufficient for &quot;Tangible Material&quot; Requirement.</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/highlights?id=76707</link>
      <description>Validity of Reopening of assessment - “tangible material” as may ever give rise to a “reason to believe&quot; - Reliance on the Report of the Justice M.B. Shah Commission - The High Codurt observed that the assessing authority primarily based its action on the report, which did not provide a definitive finding but only a possibility of under-invoicing. The court held that this did not constitute &quot;tangible material&quot; required to form a &quot;reason to believe&quot;. Consequently, the reassessment notice was deemed invalid as it was founded on speculative assumptions rather than hard evidence.</description>
      <category>Highlights</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Thu, 18 Apr 2024 18:13:11 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/highlights?id=76707</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>