<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2023 (10) TMI 1383 - ITAT JABALPUR</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=313512</link>
    <description>ITAT Jabalpur held that AO was not justified in passing assessment orders u/s 143(3) instead of u/s 153C following search operations. The tribunal ruled such assessment orders invalid and bad in law, relying on SC decision in Pr. CIT v. Abhisar Buildwell P. Ltd. The SC established that no additions can be made in completed assessments absent incriminating material found during search u/s 132 or requisition u/s 132A. The tribunal answered both questions in favor of the assessee, invalidating the assessment orders.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Mon, 09 Oct 2023 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Thu, 18 Jun 2026 11:30:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=750425" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2023 (10) TMI 1383 - ITAT JABALPUR</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=313512</link>
      <description>ITAT Jabalpur held that AO was not justified in passing assessment orders u/s 143(3) instead of u/s 153C following search operations. The tribunal ruled such assessment orders invalid and bad in law, relying on SC decision in Pr. CIT v. Abhisar Buildwell P. Ltd. The SC established that no additions can be made in completed assessments absent incriminating material found during search u/s 132 or requisition u/s 132A. The tribunal answered both questions in favor of the assessee, invalidating the assessment orders.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Mon, 09 Oct 2023 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=313512</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>