<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>Gold Confiscation Case Dismissed: Court Lacks Jurisdiction as Cause of Action Not in Rajasthan; Residency Insufficient.</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/highlights?id=76702</link>
    <description>Territorial jurisdiction of Court - Confiscation of gold - levy of penalty on the petitioner - The High Court assessed the jurisdictional aspect raised by the petitioner and concluded that the case did not fall within its jurisdiction for effective adjudication. It emphasized that no fraction of the cause of action arose in the State of Rajasthan, thereby dismissing the petitioner&#039;s arguments based on jurisdiction. Only on count of the fact that the residence of the petitioner is situated in the State of Rajasthan, the territorial jurisdiction does not lie with this Court.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Thu, 18 Apr 2024 13:27:07 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Thu, 18 Apr 2024 13:27:07 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=750408" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>Gold Confiscation Case Dismissed: Court Lacks Jurisdiction as Cause of Action Not in Rajasthan; Residency Insufficient.</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/highlights?id=76702</link>
      <description>Territorial jurisdiction of Court - Confiscation of gold - levy of penalty on the petitioner - The High Court assessed the jurisdictional aspect raised by the petitioner and concluded that the case did not fall within its jurisdiction for effective adjudication. It emphasized that no fraction of the cause of action arose in the State of Rajasthan, thereby dismissing the petitioner&#039;s arguments based on jurisdiction. Only on count of the fact that the residence of the petitioner is situated in the State of Rajasthan, the territorial jurisdiction does not lie with this Court.</description>
      <category>Highlights</category>
      <law>Customs</law>
      <pubDate>Thu, 18 Apr 2024 13:27:07 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/highlights?id=76702</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>