<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2024 (4) TMI 698 - CESTAT KOLKATA</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=751517</link>
    <description>The Tribunal determined that the gold in question was a town-seizure, as it lacked foreign markings and exhibited high purity. The Revenue failed to substantiate claims of foreign origin or smuggling. The appellants provided sufficient documented evidence of legitimate procurement. Consequently, the Tribunal set aside the confiscation order and allowed both appeals, imposing no penalties.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Wed, 17 Apr 2024 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Thu, 18 Apr 2024 08:27:22 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=750380" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2024 (4) TMI 698 - CESTAT KOLKATA</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=751517</link>
      <description>The Tribunal determined that the gold in question was a town-seizure, as it lacked foreign markings and exhibited high purity. The Revenue failed to substantiate claims of foreign origin or smuggling. The appellants provided sufficient documented evidence of legitimate procurement. Consequently, the Tribunal set aside the confiscation order and allowed both appeals, imposing no penalties.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Customs</law>
      <pubDate>Wed, 17 Apr 2024 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=751517</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>