<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>Input Tax Credit</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/forum/issue?id=119074</link>
    <description>A recipient claimed Input Tax Credit in 2018-19 while the supplier filed GSTR 1 late in 2020; the recipient took credit within the recipient&#039;s statutory time and a later enacted clause conditioning credit on supplier filing was not in force for that period. Therefore a departmental demand based solely on the supplier&#039;s delayed GSTR 1 filing is contestable, though administrative notices are common and contesting may be economically disproportionate to the disputed amount.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Wed, 17 Apr 2024 17:16:27 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Fri, 24 Jan 2025 10:40:22 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=750311" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>Input Tax Credit</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/forum/issue?id=119074</link>
      <description>A recipient claimed Input Tax Credit in 2018-19 while the supplier filed GSTR 1 late in 2020; the recipient took credit within the recipient&#039;s statutory time and a later enacted clause conditioning credit on supplier filing was not in force for that period. Therefore a departmental demand based solely on the supplier&#039;s delayed GSTR 1 filing is contestable, though administrative notices are common and contesting may be economically disproportionate to the disputed amount.</description>
      <category>Discussion-Forum</category>
      <law>GST</law>
      <pubDate>Wed, 17 Apr 2024 17:16:27 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/forum/issue?id=119074</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>