<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2008 (1) TMI 1005 - Supreme Court</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=313485</link>
    <description>The SC set aside the HC&#039;s judgment, confirming the trial court&#039;s decree. The plaintiffs were instructed to deposit the balance sale consideration within eight weeks. Upon deposit, the defendant was required to execute the sale deed. If the defendant failed, the plaintiffs could have the sale deed executed through the court. The civil appeal was allowed without costs.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Thu, 24 Jan 2008 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Wed, 17 Apr 2024 17:12:16 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=750310" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2008 (1) TMI 1005 - Supreme Court</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=313485</link>
      <description>The SC set aside the HC&#039;s judgment, confirming the trial court&#039;s decree. The plaintiffs were instructed to deposit the balance sale consideration within eight weeks. Upon deposit, the defendant was required to execute the sale deed. If the defendant failed, the plaintiffs could have the sale deed executed through the court. The civil appeal was allowed without costs.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Indian Laws</law>
      <pubDate>Thu, 24 Jan 2008 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=313485</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>