<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>High Court Sets Aside Order Due to Ignored Evidence in GST Filing Discrepancy Case; Calls for Reconsideration.</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/highlights?id=76679</link>
    <description>Rectification petition - Validity Of Order passed - discrepancy between the GSTR 3B return - The petitioner contended that the discrepancy arose due to the belated filing of GSTR 1 by the supplier for one invoice and asserted their inability to upload a reply on the GST portal. Supporting documents, including certificates from the supplier and their Chartered Accountant, were submitted but not considered in the impugned order. - The High Court found that the non-consideration of these documents was significant and warranted interference with the order. Consequently, the court set aside the order and remanded the matter to the respondent for reconsideration.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Wed, 17 Apr 2024 14:07:46 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Wed, 17 Apr 2024 14:07:46 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=750298" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>High Court Sets Aside Order Due to Ignored Evidence in GST Filing Discrepancy Case; Calls for Reconsideration.</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/highlights?id=76679</link>
      <description>Rectification petition - Validity Of Order passed - discrepancy between the GSTR 3B return - The petitioner contended that the discrepancy arose due to the belated filing of GSTR 1 by the supplier for one invoice and asserted their inability to upload a reply on the GST portal. Supporting documents, including certificates from the supplier and their Chartered Accountant, were submitted but not considered in the impugned order. - The High Court found that the non-consideration of these documents was significant and warranted interference with the order. Consequently, the court set aside the order and remanded the matter to the respondent for reconsideration.</description>
      <category>Highlights</category>
      <law>GST</law>
      <pubDate>Wed, 17 Apr 2024 14:07:46 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/highlights?id=76679</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>