https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=313483 Review jurisdiction is confined to cases where newly discovered evidence is capable of altering or cancelling the original decree. Here, the application relied on fresh evidence concerning legitimacy, but the decree also rested on an independent ground, namely want of notice under Section 48 of Local Act No. III of 1899. Because acceptance of the new material would not have displaced that separate basis, review was not maintainable. The refusal of review was therefore upheld. en-us Thu, 19 Mar 1914 00:00:00 +0530 Wed, 17 Apr 2024 12:11:59 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=313483 Review jurisdiction is confined to cases where newly discovered evidence is capable of altering or cancelling the original decree. Here, the application relied on fresh evidence concerning legitimacy, but the decree also rested on an independent ground, namely want of notice under Section 48 of Local Act No. III of 1899. Because acceptance of the new material would not have displaced that separate basis, review was not maintainable. The refusal of review was therefore upheld. Case-Laws Indian Laws Thu, 19 Mar 1914 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=313483