<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2011 (5) TMI 1151 - Supreme Court</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=313482</link>
    <description>The SC allowed the appeal, overturning the Div. Bench&#039;s order and reinstating the learned Single Judge&#039;s decision. The SC found the Single Judge&#039;s limited interim relief appropriate, permitting development to proceed while securing sale proceeds for property liabilities. The SC emphasized maintaining a balanced interlocutory arrangement without prejudicing the parties&#039; claims at trial. Each party was directed to bear its own costs.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Fri, 06 May 2011 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Wed, 17 Apr 2024 09:48:26 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=750263" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2011 (5) TMI 1151 - Supreme Court</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=313482</link>
      <description>The SC allowed the appeal, overturning the Div. Bench&#039;s order and reinstating the learned Single Judge&#039;s decision. The SC found the Single Judge&#039;s limited interim relief appropriate, permitting development to proceed while securing sale proceeds for property liabilities. The SC emphasized maintaining a balanced interlocutory arrangement without prejudicing the parties&#039; claims at trial. Each party was directed to bear its own costs.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Indian Laws</law>
      <pubDate>Fri, 06 May 2011 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=313482</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>