<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2024 (4) TMI 659 - MADRAS HIGH COURT</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=751478</link>
    <description>HC ruled in favor of petitioner challenging a GST tax order due to procedural irregularities. The court set aside the original order, directed respondent to reconsider the case, and granted petitioner 15 days to submit reply with supporting documents. Respondent must provide reasonable opportunity, including personal hearing, and issue a fresh order within two months.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Fri, 12 Apr 2024 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Wed, 30 Apr 2025 11:22:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=750259" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2024 (4) TMI 659 - MADRAS HIGH COURT</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=751478</link>
      <description>HC ruled in favor of petitioner challenging a GST tax order due to procedural irregularities. The court set aside the original order, directed respondent to reconsider the case, and granted petitioner 15 days to submit reply with supporting documents. Respondent must provide reasonable opportunity, including personal hearing, and issue a fresh order within two months.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>GST</law>
      <pubDate>Fri, 12 Apr 2024 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=751478</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>