<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2024 (4) TMI 657 - MADRAS HIGH COURT</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=751476</link>
    <description>HC upheld a GST tax demand against an alcoholic beverage manufacturer after reviewing submitted documents and statements. The court declined to interfere with the impugned order, noting that the assessing officer considered relevant evidence including license and manufacturing agreements. The petitioner was directed to file a statutory appeal within ten days, with the appellate authority instructed to evaluate the case on merits.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Wed, 10 Apr 2024 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Wed, 30 Apr 2025 11:32:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=750257" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2024 (4) TMI 657 - MADRAS HIGH COURT</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=751476</link>
      <description>HC upheld a GST tax demand against an alcoholic beverage manufacturer after reviewing submitted documents and statements. The court declined to interfere with the impugned order, noting that the assessing officer considered relevant evidence including license and manufacturing agreements. The petitioner was directed to file a statutory appeal within ten days, with the appellate authority instructed to evaluate the case on merits.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>GST</law>
      <pubDate>Wed, 10 Apr 2024 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=751476</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>