<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2024 (4) TMI 648 - ITAT PUNE</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=751467</link>
    <description>The ITAT dismissed both the Revenue&#039;s appeal and the assessee&#039;s cross objection due to jurisdictional issues, specifically the location of the Assessing Officer being outside its territorial jurisdiction. The Tribunal did not address the merits of the case or the delayed filing of the cross objection, focusing solely on jurisdictional grounds. The parties were instructed to file their appeals before the appropriate bench with jurisdiction over the Assessing Officer.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Mon, 15 Apr 2024 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Wed, 17 Apr 2024 08:30:03 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=750248" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2024 (4) TMI 648 - ITAT PUNE</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=751467</link>
      <description>The ITAT dismissed both the Revenue&#039;s appeal and the assessee&#039;s cross objection due to jurisdictional issues, specifically the location of the Assessing Officer being outside its territorial jurisdiction. The Tribunal did not address the merits of the case or the delayed filing of the cross objection, focusing solely on jurisdictional grounds. The parties were instructed to file their appeals before the appropriate bench with jurisdiction over the Assessing Officer.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Mon, 15 Apr 2024 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=751467</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>