https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=751454 Delhi HC dismissed a petition seeking directions against National Housing Bank to compel India Bulls Housing Finance Limited to produce documents and responses. The petitioner, involved in litigation with another entity, attempted to collect evidence through writ jurisdiction to file intervention or appeal applications before NCLAT regarding an NCLT Chandigarh order. The HC held that writ jurisdiction cannot be used for fishing expeditions or evidence collection against parties with pending disputes. The court emphasized that writ powers exist to protect constitutional and legal rights, not to aid fact-finding processes. The petition was dismissed as misuse and abuse of court process. en-us Tue, 16 Apr 2024 00:00:00 +0530 Wed, 17 Apr 2024 08:29:29 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=751454 Delhi HC dismissed a petition seeking directions against National Housing Bank to compel India Bulls Housing Finance Limited to produce documents and responses. The petitioner, involved in litigation with another entity, attempted to collect evidence through writ jurisdiction to file intervention or appeal applications before NCLAT regarding an NCLT Chandigarh order. The HC held that writ jurisdiction cannot be used for fishing expeditions or evidence collection against parties with pending disputes. The court emphasized that writ powers exist to protect constitutional and legal rights, not to aid fact-finding processes. The petition was dismissed as misuse and abuse of court process. Case-Laws Companies Law Tue, 16 Apr 2024 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=751454