<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>Tax Tribunal Rules Goods and Services Must Be Separately Taxed, Not as &#039;Works Contract&#039;; Invalidates Post-2012 Notices.</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/highlights?id=76653</link>
    <description>Valuation of service - works contract service or not - The CESTAT held that the appellant’s contracts were clearly split into goods and services, which did not meet the criteria of a &#039;works contract&#039; under the relevant tax laws. It was noted that the appellant had appropriately paid taxes—VAT on goods and service tax on installation services—as per the contract terms, which were well-supported by invoices. - Further the tribunal held that since the repeal of certain provisions and notifications post-July 2012, the show cause notices based on these repealed laws were incorrect. - Ultimately, the Tribunal concluded that the respondent’s approach of inclusion / amalgamating the value of goods and services for taxation under a &#039;works contract&#039; was unfounded.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Wed, 17 Apr 2024 08:29:05 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Wed, 17 Apr 2024 08:29:05 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=750227" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>Tax Tribunal Rules Goods and Services Must Be Separately Taxed, Not as &#039;Works Contract&#039;; Invalidates Post-2012 Notices.</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/highlights?id=76653</link>
      <description>Valuation of service - works contract service or not - The CESTAT held that the appellant’s contracts were clearly split into goods and services, which did not meet the criteria of a &#039;works contract&#039; under the relevant tax laws. It was noted that the appellant had appropriately paid taxes—VAT on goods and service tax on installation services—as per the contract terms, which were well-supported by invoices. - Further the tribunal held that since the repeal of certain provisions and notifications post-July 2012, the show cause notices based on these repealed laws were incorrect. - Ultimately, the Tribunal concluded that the respondent’s approach of inclusion / amalgamating the value of goods and services for taxation under a &#039;works contract&#039; was unfounded.</description>
      <category>Highlights</category>
      <law>Service Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Wed, 17 Apr 2024 08:29:05 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/highlights?id=76653</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>